A7-Other proposals submitted for European Union Funding - Revision history

A.rodeghiero at 21:47, 16 July 2011

2011-07-16T21:47:24Z

A.rodeghiero: /* For those actions which fall within the eligibility criteria for financing through other European Union financial instruments, please explain in full detail why you consider that those actions nevertheless do not fall within the main scope of the

2011-07-16T21:34:45Z

/* For those actions which fall within the eligibility criteria for financing through other European Union financial instruments, please explain in full detail why you consider that those actions nevertheless do not fall within the main scope of the

A.rodeghiero: /* For those actions which fall within the eligibility criteria for financing through other European Union financial instruments, please explain in full detail why you consider that those actions nevertheless do not fall within the main scope of the

2011-07-16T17:26:26Z

A.rodeghiero: /* For those actions which fall within the eligibility criteria for financing through other European Union financial instruments, please explain in full detail why you consider that those actions nevertheless do not fall within the main scope of the

2011-07-14T11:46:27Z

A.rodeghiero: /* Have you or any of the associated beneficiaries submitted any actions related directly or indirectly to this project to other European Union financial instruments? To whom? When and with what results? (max. 5.000 characters) */

2011-07-14T11:45:39Z

‎Have you or any of the associated beneficiaries submitted any actions related directly or indirectly to this project to other European Union financial instruments? To whom? When and with what results? (max. 5.000 characters)

A.rodeghiero: /* Have you or any of your associated beneficiaries already benefited from previous LIFE cofinancing? (please cite LIFE project reference number, title, year, amount of the co-financing, duration, name(s) of coordinating beneficiary and/or partners i

2011-07-14T11:45:25Z

/* Have you or any of your associated beneficiaries already benefited from previous LIFE cofinancing? (please cite LIFE project reference number, title, year, amount of the co-financing, duration, name(s) of coordinating beneficiary and/or partners i

A.cossu at 08:43, 24 June 2011

2011-06-24T08:43:40Z

A.rodeghiero at 10:48, 23 June 2011

2011-06-23T10:48:59Z

A.rodeghiero at 10:48, 23 June 2011

2011-06-23T10:48:19Z

A.cossu at 09:23, 22 June 2011

2011-06-22T09:23:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 16 July 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:
	- CIP – Innovation and entrepreneurship transversal theme Eco-innovation: The Competitiveness Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) finances market oriented activities related to the take up of environmental technologies and ecoinnovative activities by enterprises as well as promotion of new or integrated approaches to eco-innovation. COWS beneficiaries are not technology vendors and the solution demonstrated by COWS is delivered for implementation as a mainstreaming of waste policies improvementsand not as a market action;		- CIP – Innovation and entrepreneurship transversal theme Eco-innovation: The Competitiveness Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) finances market oriented activities related to the take up of environmental technologies and ecoinnovative activities by enterprises as well as promotion of new or integrated approaches to eco-innovation. COWS beneficiaries are not technology vendors and the solution demonstrated by COWS is delivered for implementation as a mainstreaming of waste policies improvementsand not as a market action;

−	- Structural Funds - ERDF funding may be seen on an internal dimension (POR Toscana operational programme) and on the INTERREG IVC dimesions. INTERREG IVC does not finance infrastructure or capital investments because is mainly devoted to exchange of best practices and development of policy enforcement. POR Toscana does not include this type of investment	+	- Structural Funds - ERDF funding may be seen on an internal dimension (POR CREO Toscana operational programme) and on the INTERREG IVC dimesions. INTERREG IVC does not finance infrastructure or capital investments because is mainly devoted to exchange of best practices and development of policy enforcement. POR Toscana does not include this type of investment as only axis focussing on environment Asse II addresses primarily projects that implement remediation actions on endangered sites.
		+
		+	Even if COWS ends with co-generation, its principal concern is on reducing the environomental pressure and not on energy production. It will not be financed under Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE).

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 Nonetheless, before submitting this project for requesting LIFE+ co-financing the proponent beneficiaries have examined the following instruments, and found the project not fitting the relevant scope for the reasons said below:
-- FP7/ENV: the COWS project does not perform research actions; it relies on proven ............; innovation is brought in mainly by integrating existing knowledge (approaches, methods, techniques, instruments, data) and to institutionalise coordination practices between different actors, belonging to different institutions;
+- FP7/ENV: the COWS project does not perform research actions; it relies on proven technologies and methods; the innovation site deals with the prototype stage of a solution experimented previously by the Beneficiary and conducted by the candidate Project Manager;
-- CIP – Innovation and entrepreneurship transversal theme Eco-innovation: The Competitiveness Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) finances market oriented activities related to the take up of environmental technologies and ecoinnovative activities by enterprises as well as promotion of new or integrated approaches to eco-innovation. In this regard, eco-innovation is intended to market-oriented activities focused on competitiveness. The COWS project addresses the issue of ................ from a “semi-public” viewpoint.  Hence, the project aims at developing instruments and tools primarily targeted to public administrators (Municipality, etc) 'without a market oriented, commercial purpose which is not in  partners statutes';
+- CIP – Innovation and entrepreneurship transversal theme Eco-innovation: The Competitiveness Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) finances market oriented activities related to the take up of environmental technologies and ecoinnovative activities by enterprises as well as promotion of new or integrated approaches to eco-innovation. COWS beneficiaries are not technology vendors and the solution demonstrated by COWS is delivered for implementation as a mainstreaming of waste policies improvementsand not as a market action;
-The COWS project moves from a ..........perspective towards defining a shared approach to .......... in a well-defined policy domain (natural resources) and focussed scope (xxxxxx): in this respect, the COWSproject may prove helpful to local actors to enhance the territorial attractiveness in terms of "good institutionalised practices" in policy planning, but cannot be financed and implemented under ERDF OPs.
+- Structural Funds - ERDF funding may be seen on an internal dimension (POR Toscana operational programme) and on the INTERREG IVC  dimesions. INTERREG IVC does not finance infrastructure or capital investments because is mainly devoted to exchange of best practices and development of policy enforcement. POR Toscana does not include this type of investment

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 - Structural Funds under the “Competitiveness” objective: COWS  foresees that ERDF financing falling under the regional OP may contribute to .................., nor do they foresee projects that address transferability at European level.
-The COWS project moves from a ..........perspective towards defining a shared approach to .......... in a well-defined policy domain (natural resources) and focussed scope (xxxxxx): in this respect, the RIPARO project may prove helpful to local actors to enhance the territorial attractiveness in terms of "good institutionalised practices" in policy planning, but cannot be financed and implemented under ERDF OPs.
+The COWS project moves from a ..........perspective towards defining a shared approach to .......... in a well-defined policy domain (natural resources) and focussed scope (xxxxxx): in this respect, the COWSproject may prove helpful to local actors to enhance the territorial attractiveness in terms of "good institutionalised practices" in policy planning, but cannot be financed and implemented under ERDF OPs.
 INTERREG IVC in its ..... priority ........... addresses COWS theme in a broad way, but is framed within public policies at regional regional dimension involving directly regional authorities, focussing mainly on exchange of existing best practices and without a focus on demonstration, which is pivotal in COWS

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:46, 14 July 2011
Line 17:	Line 17:


	+	None of COWS project’s actions fall within the eligibility criteria for financing through other Community financial instruments.
	+
	+	Nonetheless, before submitting this project for requesting LIFE+ co-financing the proponent beneficiaries have examined the following instruments, and found the project not fitting the relevant scope for the reasons said below:
	+
	+	- FP7/ENV: the COWS project does not perform research actions; it relies on proven ............; innovation is brought in mainly by integrating existing knowledge (approaches, methods, techniques, instruments, data) and to institutionalise coordination practices between different actors, belonging to different institutions;
	+
	+	- CIP – Innovation and entrepreneurship transversal theme Eco-innovation: The Competitiveness Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) finances market oriented activities related to the take up of environmental technologies and ecoinnovative activities by enterprises as well as promotion of new or integrated approaches to eco-innovation. In this regard, eco-innovation is intended to market-oriented activities focused on competitiveness. The COWS project addresses the issue of ................ from a “semi-public” viewpoint. Hence, the project aims at developing instruments and tools primarily targeted to public administrators (Municipality, etc) 'without a market oriented, commercial purpose which is not in partners statutes';
	+	- Structural Funds under the “Competitiveness” objective: COWS foresees that ERDF financing falling under the regional OP may contribute to .................., nor do they foresee projects that address transferability at European level.
	+
	+	The COWS project moves from a ..........perspective towards defining a shared approach to .......... in a well-defined policy domain (natural resources) and focussed scope (xxxxxx): in this respect, the RIPARO project may prove helpful to local actors to enhance the territorial attractiveness in terms of "good institutionalised practices" in policy planning, but cannot be financed and implemented under ERDF OPs.
	+	INTERREG IVC in its ..... priority ........... addresses COWS theme in a broad way, but is framed within public policies at regional regional dimension involving directly regional authorities, focussing mainly on exchange of existing best practices and without a focus on demonstration, which is pivotal in COWS

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 ==Have you or any of the associated beneficiaries submitted any actions related directly or indirectly to this project to other European Union financial instruments? To whom? When and with what results? (max. 5.000 characters)==
+No.
 ==For those actions which fall within the eligibility criteria for financing through other European Union financial instruments, please explain in full detail why you consider that those actions nevertheless do not fall within the main scope of the instrument(s) in question and are therefore included in the current project. (max. 5.000 characters)==

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==Have you or any of your associated beneficiaries already benefited from previous LIFE cofinancing? (please cite LIFE project reference number, title, year, amount of the co-financing, duration, name(s) of coordinating beneficiary and/or partners involved) (max. 5.000 characters)==
+Nevertheless all of the partners, and especially the Coordinating Beneficiary SEARIS has a long and consolidated experience in management of complex technical and environmental project, partially also financed by regional authorities.
 ==Have you or any of the associated beneficiaries submitted any actions related directly or indirectly to this project to other European Union financial instruments? To whom? When and with what results? (max. 5.000 characters)==

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:43, 24 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Please answer each of the following questions''':	+	'''Please answer each of the following questions<sup>[[Talk:{{PAGENAME}}\|discuss]]</sup>''':

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
-===Have you or any of your associated beneficiaries already benefited from previous LIFE cofinancing? (please cite LIFE project reference number, title, year, amount of the co-financing, duration, name(s) of coordinating beneficiary and/or partners involved) (max. 5.000 characters)===
+==Have you or any of your associated beneficiaries already benefited from previous LIFE cofinancing? (please cite LIFE project reference number, title, year, amount of the co-financing, duration, name(s) of coordinating beneficiary and/or partners involved) (max. 5.000 characters)==
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
-===Have you or any of the associated beneficiaries submitted any actions related directly or indirectly to this project to other European Union financial instruments? To whom? When and with what results? (max. 5.000 characters)===
+==Have you or any of the associated beneficiaries submitted any actions related directly or indirectly to this project to other European Union financial instruments? To whom? When and with what results? (max. 5.000 characters)==
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
-===For those actions which fall within the eligibility criteria for financing through other European Union financial instruments, please explain in full detail why you consider that those actions nevertheless do not fall within the main scope of the instrument(s) in question and are therefore included in the current project. (max. 5.000 characters)===
+==For those actions which fall within the eligibility criteria for financing through other European Union financial instruments, please explain in full detail why you consider that those actions nevertheless do not fall within the main scope of the instrument(s) in question and are therefore included in the current project. (max. 5.000 characters)==

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 23 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Please answer each of the following questions''':~~<br>~~	+	'''Please answer each of the following questions''':
		+

	===Have you or any of your associated beneficiaries already benefited from previous LIFE cofinancing? (please cite LIFE project reference number, title, year, amount of the co-financing, duration, name(s) of coordinating beneficiary and/or partners involved) (max. 5.000 characters)===		===Have you or any of your associated beneficiaries already benefited from previous LIFE cofinancing? (please cite LIFE project reference number, title, year, amount of the co-financing, duration, name(s) of coordinating beneficiary and/or partners involved) (max. 5.000 characters)===