B3 - Test run - Revision history

S.trenti at 06:15, 17 July 2011

2011-07-17T06:15:36Z

2011-07-17T05:26:41Z

2011-07-16T09:30:57Z

2011-07-16T09:23:15Z

2011-07-16T09:21:48Z

‎Description and methods employed (what, how, where and when)

2011-07-16T09:21:10Z

2011-07-15T11:23:10Z

2011-07-15T10:51:22Z

2011-07-15T10:49:50Z

‎Expected results

2011-07-15T10:46:29Z

‎Indicators of progress

@@ Line 87: / Line 87: @@
 * screen patterns (hole diameter and distribution).
-While pressure regulation and feeding can be done continuously, changes in distance between piston and cylinder and subtitution of screens must be off-line, with mechanical operations.
+While pressure regulation and feeding can be done continuously, changes in distance between piston and cylinder and substitution of screens must be off-line, with mechanical operations.
 Adjustments on mixer are about the height of suction pump require interventions, while calibration on rotation speed can be done online.
@@ Line 129: / Line 129: @@
 * production of surplus energy started
 * COWS process validated, including
-** pre-treatmmet prototype optimal regime;
+** pre-treatment prototype optimal regime;
 ** full COWS process running at full sludge and OFMSW inflow capacity

@@ Line 96: / Line 96: @@
 Routine analyses of supernatants (PS DVS COD NH3 TKN Ptot) gives information about the need of ammonia stripping.
 === Where ===
@@ Line 113: / Line 117: @@
 ** The internal laboratory is sufficient for most on-the-fly analyses
 ** Turnover of key project resources is low.
 == Beneficiary responsible for implementation ==

@@ Line 96: / Line 96: @@
 Routine analyses of supernatants (PS DVS COD NH3 TKN Ptot) gives information about the need of ammonia stripping.
 == Constraints and assumptions  ==
@@ Line 126: / Line 134: @@
 Deliverable D5 - COWS performance report will document the achievements.
 == Indicators of progress  ==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 <hr>
 == Description and methods employed (what, how, where and when) ==
+===What===
 The main purpose of this test run action is to get:
 * optimal processing through the COWS pre-treatment prototype subsystem;
 * optimal overall performance of the plant
 In order to achieve this goal adjustment and balancing of process parameters are to be done.
@@ Line 93: / Line 95: @@
 Optimisation of digestate dewatering require adjustment of polyelectrolyte processing.
 Routine analyses of supernatants (PS DVS COD NH3 TKN Ptot) gives information about the need of ammonia stripping.
 == Constraints and assumptions  ==

@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 ** The internal laboratory is sufficient for most on-the-fly analyses
 ** Turnover of key project resources is low.
 == Beneficiary responsible for implementation ==
@@ Line 109: / Line 113: @@
 Main results of this action are
 * overall environmental goal achieved as result of COWS full scale commissioning;
-* sending of OFMSW to composting halted.
+* sending of OFMSW to composting halted;
 * COWS process validated, including
 ** pre-treatmmet prototype optimal regime;

@@ Line 122: / Line 122: @@
 Action end: 27/08/2015
-== Indicators of progress ==
+== Indicators of progress  ==
+* Schedule and effort variance;
+** actual vs. planned start/duration of tasks (if buffer time reserved for contingencies is to be used then remediation actions must be triggered);
 == Notes and References ==
 <references />