Difference between revisions of "Talk:A2 - Consultation of key stakeholders"

From Sea
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
Effective practices for improving public awareness and involvement include: placing advance notices in newspapers; distributing information to area households; soliciting comment on design and operational options; providing information displays and in public spaces; maintaining pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs); and holding frequent public meetings and discussion forums.
 
Effective practices for improving public awareness and involvement include: placing advance notices in newspapers; distributing information to area households; soliciting comment on design and operational options; providing information displays and in public spaces; maintaining pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs); and holding frequent public meetings and discussion forums.
 
Successful incineration projects have been characterized by: holding regular meetings with concerned citizens; providing days for public visitation; posting release and operational data to the Internet; and displaying real time data on operations and releases at the facility site.
 
Successful incineration projects have been characterized by: holding regular meetings with concerned citizens; providing days for public visitation; posting release and operational data to the Internet; and displaying real time data on operations and releases at the facility site.
 +
 +
== Deliberation and knowledge ==
 +
We cannot rely on stakeholder and or public deliberation as such, since epistemic debate in
 +
science is immediately mirrored by stakeholder and public dissent in society. Policy makers are
 +
equally challenged by dissent in science as by dissent among stakeholders and the public. If we
 +
deal unreflexively with public debate induced by epistemic debate, an improper politicising
 +
effect inevitably occurs and translates into an irrational struggle concerning the “right” data and
 +
the “most trustful and authoritative scientists” in the political arena. Interest groups can pick and
 +
choose the experts which share their political objectives. A functional deliberative approach,
 +
apart from public and stakeholder deliberation, includes a deliberative extension of the science-
 +
policy interface. Such an interface institutionalises particular deliberation based on normative
 +
filters such as notions of proportionality and precaution (or as we have in the EU, the
 +
requirement to implement the precautionary principle in policy frameworks), various forms of
 +
impact analysis, such as sustainability impacts, cost-benefit analysis, environmental policy
 +
impact analysis etc., the application of particular consensual norms or prioritisation of norms (for
 +
instance that health and environment takes precedence over economic considerations) and the
 +
application of normative standards for product acceptability. These normative filters are in
 +
themselves results of public and policy deliberation and enable consensual decision making at
 +
the public policy level. Although democratic societies have these deliberative filters in place,
 +
they need to be consciously applied and be subject of public monitoring (Von Schomberg , 2007)
 +
sees a procedural gap, especially, when it comes to identification of knowledge gaps and the
 +
assessment of the quality of the available knowledge. Von Schomberg, therefore, argues for a
 +
<ref name="vonschomberg2011">Please cite as: Von Schomberg (2011) ' Prospects for Technology Assessment in a framework
 +
of responsible research and innovation ' in: M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft (eds). Technikfolgen
 +
abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden,Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag, in
 +
print</ref>
 +
 +
== References ==
 +
<references />

Latest revision as of 08:48, 16 July 2011

input[edit]

Questa fase sarà principalmente di responsabilità di Sea Ambiente ad opera dei suoi tecnici che collaboreranno con il capo progetto e gli altri tecnici di Sea Risorse per individuare le aziende che potrebbero commercializzare o realizzare un macchinario come da indicazioni di Sea Risorse per il trattamento della frazione organica.

L’attività si articolerà principalmente nell’individuazione in ambito Italiano e all’estero di soggetti con esperienza nel settore trattamento rifiuti organici con le potenzialità realizzative di un impianto prototipo sul quale effettuare modifiche in base all’andamento della sperimentazione in fase di gestione. Questa attività si concentrerà su ricerche tramite web e su consultazioni di riviste di settore.

Per verificare la rispondenza alle esigenze dei soggetti individuati saranno effettuate visite a impianti in essere.

La criticità di questa di fase potrebbe essere quella di non riuscire ad individuare tutti i soggetti con i requisiti richiesti, questa comunque sarà risolta in fase di gara con la richiesta di manifestazione di interesse.

In questa fase si effettuerà inoltre uno studio sull’andamento della produzione della frazione organica nei comuni già serviti dalle aziende Sea Risorse e Sea Ambiente, con particolare attenzione a definire gli standard operativi del prototipo in base alla qualità del raccolto e alla qualità raccoglibile se il sistema di raccolta porta a porta venisse ulteriormente ampliato.

Si cercheranno dati merceologici anche sulla frazione organica attualmente raccolta nei comuni della Versilia nonché uno studio del quantitativo raccoglibile alla luce di un dimensione corretto dell’impianto prototipo.

La responsabilità di queste ricerche sarà completamente a cura di Sea Ambiente che avrà il supporto di Sea Risorse per l’analisi dei dati ottenuti e per l’inquadramento in un’ottica di processo operativo in larga scala.

output[edit]

Frazione OFMSW residua dal trattamento meccanico[edit]

residui del processo di codigestione anaerobica[edit]

Dato che il surnatante prodotto dalla fase di codigestione anaerobica sarà inviato a trattamento di depurazione nella linea acque del depuratore gestita da Gaia SpA, gestore del servizio idrico integrato per le Provincie di Lucca e Massa Carrara, vi potrebbero essere dei problemi da parte della Provincia in merito all’aggravio di carico organico da trattare. Questo problema nel caso si presentasse sarebbe risolto da Sea Risorse prevedendo sul surnatante uno strip di ammoniaca (ammonia stripping) che consenta di abbattere il carico immesso sulla linea acque in modo da non scompensare l’attuale processo depurativo.

stakeholder involvement[edit]

Maintaining Public Awareness and Communication. Creating and maintaining public good will towards any waste treatment project is critical to the success of the venture. Outreach should begin as early in the planning of the project as possible. The public and citizen’s advocacy groups will have understandable concerns about the construction and operation of a facility and dealing with these openly and honestly will help prevent misinformation and misunderstanding. Effective practices for improving public awareness and involvement include: placing advance notices in newspapers; distributing information to area households; soliciting comment on design and operational options; providing information displays and in public spaces; maintaining pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs); and holding frequent public meetings and discussion forums. Successful incineration projects have been characterized by: holding regular meetings with concerned citizens; providing days for public visitation; posting release and operational data to the Internet; and displaying real time data on operations and releases at the facility site.

Deliberation and knowledge[edit]

We cannot rely on stakeholder and or public deliberation as such, since epistemic debate in science is immediately mirrored by stakeholder and public dissent in society. Policy makers are equally challenged by dissent in science as by dissent among stakeholders and the public. If we deal unreflexively with public debate induced by epistemic debate, an improper politicising effect inevitably occurs and translates into an irrational struggle concerning the “right” data and the “most trustful and authoritative scientists” in the political arena. Interest groups can pick and choose the experts which share their political objectives. A functional deliberative approach, apart from public and stakeholder deliberation, includes a deliberative extension of the science- policy interface. Such an interface institutionalises particular deliberation based on normative filters such as notions of proportionality and precaution (or as we have in the EU, the requirement to implement the precautionary principle in policy frameworks), various forms of impact analysis, such as sustainability impacts, cost-benefit analysis, environmental policy impact analysis etc., the application of particular consensual norms or prioritisation of norms (for instance that health and environment takes precedence over economic considerations) and the application of normative standards for product acceptability. These normative filters are in themselves results of public and policy deliberation and enable consensual decision making at the public policy level. Although democratic societies have these deliberative filters in place, they need to be consciously applied and be subject of public monitoring (Von Schomberg , 2007) sees a procedural gap, especially, when it comes to identification of knowledge gaps and the assessment of the quality of the available knowledge. Von Schomberg, therefore, argues for a <ref name="vonschomberg2011">Please cite as: Von Schomberg (2011) ' Prospects for Technology Assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation ' in: M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft (eds). Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden,Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag, in print</ref>

References[edit]

<references />

Retrieved from "http://sea.klink.it/index.php?title=Talk:A2_-_Consultation_of_key_stakeholders&oldid=726"