Difference between revisions of "B3 - Test run"
m |
m |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Description and methods employed (what, how, where and when) == | == Description and methods employed (what, how, where and when) == | ||
| − | + | The main purpose of this action is to get: | |
| + | * optimal separation/pulping processing through the COWS prototype subsystem; | ||
| + | * optimal overall performance of the plant | ||
| + | |||
| + | In order to achieve this goal adjustment and balancing of process parameters are to be done. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Process data monitored are those in table 1 and 2 <ref name="processdata"> Table 1 – Characteristics of OFMSW influent (average monthly) and Table 2 – Average monthly total VSS and COD load of sludge (PS+WAS) and OF-MSW </ref> | Process data monitored are those in table 1 and 2 <ref name="processdata"> Table 1 – Characteristics of OFMSW influent (average monthly) and Table 2 – Average monthly total VSS and COD load of sludge (PS+WAS) and OF-MSW </ref> | ||
Revision as of 07:16, 15 July 2011
B3 - Test run Batch digestion tests with controlled input Calibration of COWS subsystem Incremental optimisation of the full process Test of operational limits M - Validation of full scale COWS process D5 - COWS performance report
Contents
Description and methods employed (what, how, where and when)
The main purpose of this action is to get:
- optimal separation/pulping processing through the COWS prototype subsystem;
- optimal overall performance of the plant
In order to achieve this goal adjustment and balancing of process parameters are to be done.
Process data monitored are those in table 1 and 2 <ref name="processdata"> Table 1 – Characteristics of OFMSW influent (average monthly) and Table 2 – Average monthly total VSS and COD load of sludge (PS+WAS) and OF-MSW </ref>
Constraints and assumptions
Indicate what may prevent you from implementing the action as planned and what will be done to address this risk. Please ensure that these constraints and assumptions are in line with those indicated on Form B5.
Beneficiary responsible for implementation
Please indicate which of the project's beneficiaries will be in charge of the implementation of each action. Should more than one beneficiary be implicated, please give full details of which beneficiary is responsible for what.
Expected results
Please indicate (preferably in bullet points) the quantified/measurable results/outputs from the action. Please indicate whether they will be used in other actions and how.
Indicators of progress
Please indicate how progress of this action will be measured. The descriptions may be accompanied by explanatory graphs, tables or pictures which may be included in the forms by using the “Pictures” check box.
Notes and References
<references />
Table 1 – Characteristics of OFMSW influent (average monthly)
| Date | COD | (mg/l) | Average | Quantity | (m3/day) | VSS Load | (kg/day) |
| Month 1 | |||||||
| Month 2 | |||||||
| ... |
Table 2 – Average monthly total VSS and COD load of sludge (PS+WAS) and OF-MSW
| Date | Total VSS inserted (kg/day) | Total COD inserted (kg/day) | Total VSS inserted (kg/day) | Total COD inserted (kg/day) | Total VSS inserted (kg/day) | Total COD inserted (kg/day) |
| Month 1 | ||||||
| Month 2 | ||||||
| ... |
Nomenclature
CHP – Combined Heat and Power
COD – Chemical Oxygen Demand
HRT – Hydraulic Retention Time
OLR – Organic Loading Rate
OF-MSW – Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste
PS – Primary Sludge
TSS – total Suspended Solids
VSS – Volatile Suspended Solids
WAS – Waste Activated Sludge
WWTP – Wastewater Treatment Plant
